Tag Archives: Riot Police

More Questions Than Answers

Ferguson protests. Photo by Loavesofbread (own work) via Wikimedia Commons

Ferguson protests. Photo by Loavesofbread (own work) via Wikimedia Commons

Yesterday, we wrote about what’s been happening in Ferguson, Missouri. Later during the day (we publish our posts very early in the morning as a rule), Thomas Jackson, Ferguson’s chief of police, had numerous press conferences which we feel raised more questions than they answered.

In the first press conference, Jackson announced the name of the officer who shot Michael Brown; a four year veteran of the force named Darren Wilson. At the same time, he said that Michael Brown was suspected of stealing a box of cigars and assaulting a convenience store clerk. He then produced a surveillance tape that appears to show Brown assaulting the clerk. Seems pretty straight forward, right? Well, no – not really.

When Jackson was asked later why he released the tape at the press conference, he said because he “had to,” based on several formal requests from media organizations. Now, as far as we know from reading and listening to the media over the last few days, the media had no idea that such a tape existed. What we do know is that the media had been requesting the officer who killed Brown’s report on the incident, as well as any dash camera video if any existed. Did Jackson produce either of those things? Of course not. And, of course, Officer Wilson is conveniently out of town “for his own protection.”

At this press conference, it was implied that Officer Wilson had been responding to the convenience store incident when he stopped Brown. However, in a later press conference, Jackson stated that the “initial contact was not related to the robbery,” and that Brown had been stopped for walking down the middle of the street. We have to wonder when jaywalking became a legitimate reason to use deadly force, but we digress as usual.

Captain Ron Johnson. Photo by Loavesofbread (own work) via Wikimedia Commons

Captain Ron Johnson. Photo by Loavesofbread (own work) via Wikimedia Commons

Captain Ron Johnson, the Missouri state patrol officer who took command of the various police forces in Ferguson on Thursday, said that he “would have liked to have been consulted” about the simultaneous release of the officer’s name and the information about the alleged robbery. “The information could have been put out in a different way,” Johnson said at a press conference.

Now hold on – isn’t Johnson supposed to be in charge of the police who are dealing with this matter? Why wasn’t he consulted? Jackson’s response was that he had used the same chain of command he’d been using before Governor Jay Nixon had put Johnson in charge; in other words, his Ferguson police and the St. Louis County police’s officer in charge. We have to wonder whether ignoring the governor’s orders is par for the course for the Ferguson police.

In related news, Bob McCulloch wasn’t happy with the governor’s decision to turn control of security over to Johnson, telling the St. Louis Post-Dispatch“It’s shameful what he did today, he had no legal authority to do that. To denigrate the men and women of the county police department is shameful.” Who is Bob McCulloch and why is this important? He’s the prosecuting attorney for St. Louis County; the very person who would be responsible for bringing any charges against Officer Wilson. We guess he evidently didn’t see any problem with turning Ferguson into a war zone, but we could be wrong.

We feel that yesterday’s disclosures raises more questions than it answered. The first question is if they had this information about Brown and the alleged robbery before, why didn’t they disclose it earlier? We’d think that releasing this information earlier would have helped defuse the anger in the community; the community would have still been angry, but the police could have at least claimed that to be the cause for Wilson’s actions.

Our second question is why wasn’t Officer Wilson’s report released? We find it suspicious that they released the surveillance tapes allegedly of Brown assaulting the convenience store owner when as far as we know, nobody outside the police were aware that they existed, yet fail to release the documentation that everybody’s been asking to see.

Our last question may be the most important of all. Is the Ferguson police department in general and Chief Jackson in particular really this incompetent, or are they covering up something? Our guess would be both.

Share Button

A Little Respect Goes A Long Way

On Sunday, we wrote about something which became the biggest story in the country over the last few days; the killing of Michael Brown, an unarmed black man, by the local police.

We heard about the looting and riots that Sunday night. We saw the FAA declare a no-fly zone over Ferguson, and tell reporters to leave the area. We saw the steady ramping up of the police response, with them acting more like a paramilitary force than a civilian law enforcement agency as time went on.

Photo via Facebook

Photo via Facebook

Then, Wednesday night, we and the rest of the world watched in horror as the police in Ferguson proved themselves to be every bit as repressive and thuggish as the police in those countries that we regularly chastise for human rights violations.

The buildup had been going on ever since Sunday’s riots. Though the demonstrations since then had been mostly peaceful, the police became more and more aggressive as the days went past. The smell of tear gas filled the night air; a chemical agent that’s banned in warfare (by an international treaty that we as a country signed) – that is, unless the warfare’s inside our own borders, evidently. But, I digress.

During the day on Wednesday, the tension built. We saw the chief of police make a statement saying that the citizens could protest during the daylight hours. However, he softened his stance when asked by reporters if this meant that a curfew was in place. The tension built more.

Then came the arrest and assault of two reporters guilty of nothing more than taking pictures of the police as they came into the McDonald’s that the reporters were using as their base. One was from the Washington Post, and the other from the Huffington Post. The ironic thing here is that the Washington Post with all of its reporters around the world had only had one other reporter arrested this year – that was in Tehran. The police then tear gassed and fired rubber bullets at an Al Jazeera America news crew while they were setting up their equipment. 

Al Jazeera television crew  runs for cover. Photo via Facebook

Al Jazeera television crew runs for cover. Photo via Facebook

The pictures coming out of Ferguson Wednesday night looked like a war zone, with clouds of smoke (or in this case, gas) hanging over everything. Fireworks filled the skies as the police used stun grenades and tear gas on the peaceful protesters, and fired rubber bullets at them. The world was watching, and most of us didn’t like what we saw.

The condemnation of the police and shows of solidarity with the people of Ferguson were quick to occur. Yesterday there were Moment of Silence events nationwide paying respect to victims of police brutality. Palestinians living in Gaza took to Twitter to instruct the residents of Ferguson how to deal with tear gas. This was oddly ironic, as the former St. Louis County Police chief Timothy Fitch had taken counterterrorism lessons from the Israeli government back in 2009, and had been in charge of the St. Louis County Police until his retirement earlier this year. Because after all, who knows more about crowd control and tramping on civil rights more than the Israelis do? But, i digress again.

Today, two voices that had been strangely absent from the conversation chimed in. First, President Obama made a statement, deploring both the looting and the police overreach, saying that there was “no excuse” for either. Then, Missouri Governor Jay Nixon removed control of the operation from the St. Louis County and Ferguson forces, and instead put the Missouri State Patrol in charge, naming Captain Ron Johnson as the commander. This move not only put someone who could relate to the community in charge (Johnson’s black and had grown up in Ferguson); it also made one person in charge. Up until then, the decision to fire tear gas, use rubber bullets and the like rotated among the four main police groups there (St. Louis County, St. Louis (the city), Ferguson and the Highway Patrol); hence, no overall accountability.

Captain Johnson made his presence known quickly. Not by massing troops in military garb holding guns on the protesters as had been the rule for the three days before, but by joining them as they marched down the street. The State Troopers were out, but it was obvious that they were there in case something happened, and not as an oppressive, occupying force to be reckoned with.

This doesn’t mean that all the problems are over; far from it. There’s the problem of under representation; Ferguson is almost 70% black, and blacks account for 93% of the arrests made by Ferguson police. The 53 man police force only has three black officers, and the black community’s not represented in the local government and school board either. Then, there’s the fact that the Ferguson police department still hasn’t released the name of the officer that shot Michael Brown, even though they’ve published the names and addresses of nine people who were charged with looting in Sunday’s riots. The two separate sets of rules idea runs deep in Ferguson, as it does in many other cities and towns across the nation, any of which could blow up as Ferguson did this week.

But, hopefully the powers that be learned three very important lessons that need to be applied at a national level. The first, of course, is don’t kill unarmed people. The second lesson is that you can only push people so far. We’ve had four fairly well publicized cases of police killing unarmed black men within the last month alone, and Ferguson isn’t alone in its vast difference between the majority of its population and who calls the shots. Finally, the third lesson, which is just as important, is to treat your citizens with respect. Up until last night, the police treated the people of Ferguson more like animals than as fellow human beings, and acted more out of fear than anything else. Last night, the police treated the protesters as fellow human beings, and respected their right to peacefully assemble; something that the citizens of Ferguson are thankful for.

Share Button

Time For A New Night Out

Rodney King beaten by LA police 1991. Original video shot by George Holliday (fair use)

Rodney King beaten by LA police 1991. Original video shot by George Holliday (fair use)

On August 7, 1984, the National Association of Town Watch (NATW) had the first National Night Out. National Night Out was (and is) intended to be an effort to promote involvement in crime prevention activities, police-community partnerships, and neighborhood camaraderie. Since its beginning, National Night Out has grown to include over 37 million people and over 16,000 communities nationwide.

However, what happens when the police aren’t so much protecting as they are terrorizing the community? We’ve been seeing examples of this more and more often; from the militarization of our police departments to the increasing number of excessive force incidents to the racial profiling of our citizens under such programs as stop and frisk to the cold blooded murder of innocent people.

Yesterday, we saw a prime example of the latter in Ferguson, Missouri. Michael Brown, a young man who was supposed to start college tomorrow, was shot multiple times in the back by a Ferguson police officer on Saturday afternoon as he was walking to his grandmother’s house.

Local residents were understandably upset and angry over the shooting, with some of the residents screaming threats to “kill the police.” Confrontation between the police and residents escalated, with 100 police cars from 15 different departments eventually being called to the scene.

Unfortunately, incidents like this are becoming more and more common. Back in April, the U.S. Justice Department released a report criticizing the Albuquerque, New Mexico police department for a longstanding history of police brutality and unnecessary deadly force. And, last month we had the murder of Eric Garner by the NYPD. 

Now, we at Occupy World Writes aren’t saying all police are bad; far from it. They do an unfortunately necessary job that we ourselves could never do, and they witness horrors we can only imagine in the darkest corners of our imaginations. However, the number of bad apples who find their way into the police departments across the nation is frightening, to put it mildly.

The original intent of the National Night Out was to foster good police-community relations, and to show that the community stood together to fight crime. But what about the crimes committed by the police? Isn’t it time we stand together as a community and say that such behavior by the people who are supposed to protect us is unacceptable?

We need a new Night Out; one of communities standing united against police overreach and brutality.

Share Button

Pain in Spain falls mainly on the Plain

Image via Twitter

Image via Twitter

March 22, 2014: The Marches for Dignity M-22, a protest against austerity, turned violent resulting in 88 being injured and 29 arrested in Madrid, according to a report in RT. The demonstrators are demanding an end to the so-called Troika-style cuts in Spain, more jobs and affordable housing.

The protest was scheduled by demonstrators objecting to austerity. Hoisting banners reading “no more cuts!” and similar messages, the protesters called for an end to the government’s “empty promises.” Spain’s current unemployment rate is 26%. Hundreds of people are evicted from their homes every day. The General Council of the Judiciary reported that 49,984 forced evictions had been carried out across the country last year, which averages about 185 a day. The conditions left many Spanish citizens with nowhere to turn. This is reflected in the growing number of suicides in the country, with the country’s National Institute of Statistics estimating that at least 8 people take their lives every day in the country.

Image via Twitter

Image via Twitter

Using tactics including teargas and baton beatings, riot police blocked the protestors from breaking through a barrier. The Spanish authorities have deployed 1,650 riot police to keep the situation under control.

“The mass rally was coming to an an end when reportedly a group of younger protesters, who had masks on their faces, started throwing rocks at the police. Police tried to push them away from the parameter that they organized around this area,” RT’s Egor Piskunov reported from Madrid.

“They (police) tried to push them (protesters) away from these police fences and then we started seeing firecrackers being thrown at police and reportedly authorities started firing rubber bullets at the protesters. As a result, there are injuries on both sides and several people have been arrested as well.”

Image via Twitter

Image via Twitter

Six “columns” of trains, cars and buses, as well as bands of pedestrians have travelled from Extremadura, Andalusia, Valencia, Murcia, Asturias, Galicia and Aragon, among other Spanish regions, to converge on Madrid in mass protest this Saturday,” the report adds.

Occupy World Writes stands in solidarity with those in Madrid and throughout Spain who seek a peaceful resolution to the austerity that is oppressing them. We call on all governments to address the basic human rights and needs of their people in expeditious measures that result in progress and growth.

The Spanish Spring has arrived!

Share Button

International Day Against Police Brutality

Toronto police during G20 protest 2011. Photo courtesy Police Brutality Info (www.policebrutality.info)

Toronto police during G20 protest 2011. Photo courtesy Police Brutality Info (www.policebrutality.info)

If there is any city that has perfected the International Day Against Police Brutality, it would be Montreal, Canada. Since 1997, the annual event has resulted in mass arrest.

What began as an initiative of the Montreal based Collective Opposed to Police Brutality and the Black Flag group in Switzerland has become a celebration in and of itself. Last year’s event resulted in more than 200 people being detained and given $637 in fines (each) for violating municipal bylaws and 12 others were arrested for criminal acts. The first arrest was made before the march even began.

Montreal police use the same tactics as any other militarized police force; cordoning, kettling, tear gas, water cannons, shield pushing, wedging and baton attacks, to name only a few. They also open the event up to surrounding police forces to come for training and support. In 2013, they added a high-tech command center to their arsenal to help their efforts.

Their efforts have paid off. Montreal now attracts people from across the country that take part. Students are not the only participants, and some come to view the events from a tourist perspective, watching from hotel windows as events unfold in the streets below them.

The event has spread to other cities in Canada as well as world-wide. In the United States, the focus is on October 22 (O22), known as National Anti Police Brutality Day.

Israeli police pepper spray injured Palestinian protester. Photo courtesy Police Brutality Info (www.policebrutality.info)

Israeli police pepper spray injured Palestinian protester. Photo courtesy Police Brutality Info (www.policebrutality.info)

While Montreal and other cities experiences their marches, rallies and arrests, let us be reminded of what this day represents. Perhaps you remember the scene from UC Davis, of seated students being pepper sprayed by an officer (who ended up being awarded $38,000 by the courts for HIS emotional duress); Oakland Occupy encampment brutalities; state troopers who pull over women and rape them; SWAT teams breaking into homes and shooting to kill – only to discover they have the wrong address; numerous examples from America exist.

This is nothing when compared to experiences in other countries. Police are supposed to protect the people. What they actually do is protect the state and the property of the corporations and top income holders. They prevent people from exercising their rights to assembly, rights to language and cultural heritages, rights to redress their grievances to their governments, and rights to be treated with respect, dignity and humanity.

Share Button