Monthly Archives: May 2014

For My Mom

Today’s the second Sunday in May, which means it’s Mother’s Day. And, while we might (and should) rail about the rampant commercialism of the holiday (even Anna Jarvis, the one person considered as making the day a national institution, decried what the holiday had become), the honoring of mothers across the country is still a worthwhile goal.

There aren’t many days, if any, that I don’t think at least once about my mom (or my dad, for that matter). However, there’s a few days a year I spend more time than usual thinking about her and what impact she had on my life.

It was 1965, and we had moved to the Chicago area from the Twin Cities the year before. My dad was the manager at the 3M plant in Bedford Park, and we kids were off at school all day. My mom, to fill up some of her spare time, took a part time job at the West Side Christian Parish, The West Side Christian Parish was founded in 1952 as an interdenominational church, but in the following years became more of a multiservice agency, providing many social services as well as operating storefront churches throughout Chicago’s west side. By the time my mom had arrived, the West Side Christian Parish’s main focus was on the civil rights movement. My mom’s boss was a young South Carolina native who was going to the Chicago Theological Seminary before dropping out to work full time with the civil rights movement; a man who most of you have heard of – Jesse Jackson.

In 1966, we participated in a program sponsored by the WSCP. For two weeks, we had a girl from the West Side come and live with us in the suburbs. At this time, the suburb where we lived (La Grange) was strictly white, so Erma coming to stay with us raised more than a few eyebrows and created lots of neighborhood gossip, none of it pretty.

When my dad was transferred back to the Twin Cities later that year, we sold our house to friends of ours, so our house never went up for sale on the normal market. After we had moved, the moving company sent in a cleaning crew; they were all black. Within a week, over half the houses on our block went up for sale on the rumor that we’d sold to a black family, because why else would we haven’t had a for sale sign outside and all the normal trappings of selling a house in America if that wasn’t the case.

My mom’s response was typical for her. Her first thought was “You have to be kidding me!” When she discovered that this was the actual response, she never stepped foot in that neighborhood again or had anything to do with anybody living there, even though we visited the area fairly often, as one of her brothers lived in the Chicago area, and my mom and dad still had many friends who lived around Chicago, as did we kids.

As we kids grew older and went through our teenage years, our house was always the home away from home for all of our friends. I remember many days when I’d get home from school and there’d be a bunch of my twin sister’s and my friends, sitting around the kitchen table and talking to my mom. I remember my mom providing a safe place on more than one occasion for somebody who ran away while things could be ironed out between him/her and their parents. I remember my mom lending money to more than one couple so the girl could get reproductive care and not have to drop out of school, get married at way too young an age or get thrown out of her house when she told her parents what had happened.

And, then there were the strays we’d bring home. My sister and I were true children of the ’60s and ’70s, and on numerous occasions, one of us would meet somebody who’d been hitching crosscountry or something along those lines, and we’d bring them home with us. They’d end up staying with us for a couple days, and join in the daily chat around the kitchen table. The one thing we’d always hear from them is “Your mom is a wonderful lady. I hope you realize how lucky you are.” We’d say we did, but I don’t think we really appreciated what wonderful lessons in life we had courtesy of my mother.

Fast forward to Easter Sunday, 1999. I’m at my parents’ for dinner, and my mom and I are having a smoke on their balcony. She told me that she has terminal cancer. She’s had two previous bouts so I shouldn’t be that surprised by the news, but it hits me like a ton of bricks. She said that she wasn’t going to undergo chemo, radiation or any of the other ruses that we use to deny our own mortality for a while longer. During the fall of 2000, she began to decline noticeably, and she passed away right after New Years of 2001.

Mind you, my mom wasn’t perfect by any means. She drank too much. She could be petty and vindictive upon occasion. She had other demons that I won’t discuss here, but don’t we all? When I think of my mom, I think of her giving spirit. I marvel at her ability to not pass negative judgment on anybody until it was richly deserved. And, on the rare occasions that she did prejudge somebody, I admire how she could admit that she had, and how she tried to correct the situation. She set a high bar for me to reach in interacting with others; I try every day to be as open minded as she was. And, she taught me the joy and wisdom of accepting when the end has come; to meet your end on your own terms.

This is my 14th Mother’s Day without her, and it doesn’t get any easier. Happy Mother’s Day, Mom. I love you…

Share Button

Fracking Creates Quakes, NOT Cheaper Pump Prices!

Image by Mikenorton (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Image by Mikenorton (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0], via Wikimedia Commons

At the end of April, scientists met with the Seismological Society of America to discuss induced earthquakes. Among their main areas of conclusion, Aljazeera reports, “Research… suggests that the biggest wells contribute about 85 percent of the pressure changes that can lead to earthquakes. With more information, industry could theoretically adjust fracking technology to avoid inducing seismic activity, the scientists said at the meeting. But when it comes to regulation, there appears to be a wide gap in policy. “There’s quite an absence of regulatory framework in terms of how to evaluate the hazard and who’s responsible for assessing and responding,” Atkinson said.

“The USGS, EPA, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are all currently researching induced earthquakes and their causes, the panel said. The USGS is carrying out a first of its kind study this year, creating a seismic hazard map based not only on naturally occurring earthquakes, but also ‘induced’ earthquakes, such as those triggered by fracking activities. The scientists said more information is needed to better understand induced earthquakes. While industry actors must report some information, scientists say this data is insufficient and not made publicly available often enough.”

A 5.7 magnitude earthquake shook the ground near Prague, Oklahoma in 2011, accompanied by 2 other quakes registering magnitudes greater than 5.0. It was felt in 17 states. In fact, the central United States has seen an 11-fold increase in earthquakes in the past four years alone, according to Geology, a widely accepted scientific journal. The affected areas studied in the report included Arkansas, Texas, Ohio and Colorado.

On March 6, 2014, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) released a press statement indicating the Prague, OK earthquake is directly related to the injection well activity occurring in the area. Although unintentional, the evidence shows the earthquakes are human-induced. Despite this risk, authorities in Oklahoma continue to allow waste-water injection near the Wilzetta fault.

In a report from Raw Story, “The 5.7 magnitude quake in Prague followed an injection of waste-water approximately 650 feet away from the Wilzetta fault zone, a complex fault system about 124 miles in length. All three earthquakes exhibited a slip-strike motion, and did so at three different locations, indicating that three separate areas of the fault zone were activated.”

All this comes at a time that Azle, Texas remains “The Town in Search of Truth,” a story we first began with our article, “When Science and Politics Collide, Corporations Win.” We have noticed a clear reluctance of any corporate media to feature this story, as its implications are as contrary to their corporate partners as evidence of global warming and climate change. To identify corporate partners, simply observe who advertises and who appears in their commentary programs. Also take note of who is lining the pockets of politicians.

We believe all these things are related. We understand empirical science, research and discoveries to be beneficial for the human race, whether it is a cure for a horrible illness or the discovery of plate tectonics. But we are alarmed at the willingness to pick and choose science based on corporation profit lines.

When science tells us to that we are tipping the scales to the perilous point of no return through our pollution, consumption of fossil fuels, interference with genetics and food sources and our insatiable appetite to take it all right now, before anyone else can, we need to STOP. But this is when the pressure mounts and all reason leaves the discussion; it becomes arguments for deregulation, free market, corporate development and shareholder portfolios.

Share Button

Clashes Could Occur

Yingluck Shinawatra. By Gerd Seidel (Rob Irgendwer) (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Yingluck Shinawatra. By Gerd Seidel (Rob Irgendwer) (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0], via Wikimedia Commons

On Wednesday, May 7, 2014, Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra of Thailand, was removed from power following a Constitutional Court ruling that Ms Yingluck acted illegally when she transferred her national security head to another position in 2011. The following day, the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) unanimously voted to indict Ms Yingluck, the commission’s chief said. If convicted, Ms. Yingluck will be barred from politics for 5 years. The NACC is also considering whether to file criminal charges against Ms Yingluck.

Thailand’s turmoil began in November of 2013, after Yingluck had secured the support of her base in the northern regions of the country by providing free health care and other subsidies in exchange for their loyalty. However, anti-government protesters, who tend to be urban and middle-class voters, have protested against Ms Yingluck’s administration for months, occupying official buildings and disrupting elections in February. They say ousted former leader Thaksin Shinawatra, who is also Ms Yingluck’s brother, is still controlling the government, and that the ruling party has been buying votes with irresponsible spending pledges aimed at its support base.

Both sides have planned rallies this week, and there are fears that clashes could occur.

Thailand continues to evolve from the old regime of an isolated Unitary parliamentary constitutional monarchy toward a more open and democratic state. As the progression travels through the Thai culture, there will be many hard and difficult lessons in the coming years. Democracy is not easy.

Thailand was attempting these changes when the rice scandal revealed levels of corruption and misappropriation that the US Congress could envy. Under the rice subsidy scheme, the government bought rice from Thai farmers at a much higher price than on the global market. Ms Yingluck has previously said she was only in charge of formulating the policy, not the day-to-day running of the scheme, and has said that the commission treated her unfairly. However, it resulted in the accumulation of huge stockpiles of rice and hit Thailand’s rice exports hard.

Meet the new boss… Same as the old boss.

Share Button

Under The Radar

University of New Mexico logo. Courtesy Wikimedia Commons

University of New Mexico logo. Courtesy Wikimedia Commons

Sunday was the 44th anniversary of the Kent State shootings. Most of us know the story; how four people were killed and nine wounded when National Guard troops opened fire during a demonstration over the bombings in Cambodia. However, today marks the 44th anniversary of another act of violence almost as egregious (even though there weren’t any fatalities), yet most people won’t have even heard of it.

After the Kent State shootings, students at campuses all across the country participated in marches, strikes and demonstrations. One of these campuses was the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, where students took over the Student Union Building (SUB). Classes were suspended while students demonstrated against the Kent State shootings and the bombings in Cambodia. As the tensions began to ebb,. most of the students left the SUB, leaving half a dozen or so to occupy the building.

On Friday, March 8, 1970, Lieutenant Governor E. Lee Francis, acting as governor (the governor at the time, David Cargo, was in Michigan) called out the National Guard, who along with the University police, New Mexico State Police and the Albuquerque Police went to retake the SUB by request of the university’s Regent, Calvin Horn. When the students learned that the Guard and police were coming, they reoccupied the building.

When the Guard and police first arrived, there were about 150 people inside the SUB’s ballroom, and very few people outside the SUB. By the time State Police Major Hoover Wimberly called on the students to disperse, there were thousands outside. The combined Guard and police forces arrested 156 people, If that was all that had happened, it would be the end of the story.

However, the National Guardsmen swept up the side of the building with their bayonets unsheathed. Eight people were stabbed by the Guardsmen, including one member of the press.

Later, the charges against most of the students were dropped. However, charges against the National Guard went nowhere, as they had covered or removed their name tags prior to moving in on the SUB, so that they couldn’t be identified. In the case of the member of the press who was stabbed, the Guard claimed that he was walking backwards while filming them and fell into a rosebush.

The spring of 1970 was marked by violent suppression of First Amendment rights by the authorities. We’ve seen the same thing happen time and again in recent years, with notable examples being the RNC 2008 protests in St. Paul and the various police actions against the Occupy movement since the fall of 2011.

Occupy World Writes demands that the authorities in this country respect the peoples’ right to peaceful protest and freedom of speech. We furthermore call on all nations worldwide to do the same with their people. The only way we can move forward as a truly global society is if the right to dissent is respected by all.

 

 

 

Share Button

No Comment

There are times we cover stories because we believe there are principles that apply to the tenants of the Occupy movement. There are also times that we choose NOT to cover certain stories for reasons we consider to be bigger than ourselves.

The most recent example we can use to explain how we choose what to cover and why is the news from Nigeria regarding the kidnapping of 276 school girls. We have been following this story since it broke, but have not published a response or comment. Why? Because we believe that extremist organizations like Boca Harem do these things to shock and horrify the world and bring attention to their cause and viewpoints. Occupy World Writes draws a line in giving a platform to any group that uses human trafficking, murder and rape as stepping stones to the world stage of notoriety. By publishing a comment while these girls are still in captivity that may be seen by those guilty of the crime, we could risk the possible safety of these girls. We will not give this group that power or voice. The international community has put more resources and effort in finding a missing plane where all are presumed dead than they are in recovering these young women, who are quite alive and will be sold into sexual slavery. SHAME ON THE WORLD.

Another example of recent news we chose not to cover is the Cliven Bundy story. In this case, we saw Mr. Bundy as the oppressor, both in his attitudes toward other ranchers and his viewpoints when he decided to “tell you something about the negro.” We have problems with armed militia groups in America that have taken over the town of Bunkersville, and question why something is not being done. If this were a group of Occupy folks, they would all have been arrested. If these people were wearing turbans instead of cowboy hats, America’s populace would be screaming for authorities to step in. If Cliven Bundy were black or Latino, no one in Nevada would have stood beside him.

Then there is the amount of coverage we give certain topics. We talked consistently about Ukraine when that story began developing. Why didn’t we continue? Because once the main-stream media picks up on a story, they will examine it ad nauseum. Example: the GWB scandal, where we learned who Bridget Kelly had been dating, as if that has anything to do with the corruption within New Jersey politics or “traffic studies” om the world’s busiest bridge. We also assume you are a thinking, breathing, competent human being who can follow stories that interest you without the use of a 2X4.

You will sometimes see posts that aren’t really news at all. Why are they in there? Because sometimes the idea is the news – the teaching moment or the time to pause and try to make sense of a bigger picture. And we know we are not always right, and that not everyone will agree with us. They aren’t supposed to – individual critical thinking is the goal. Occupy your consciousness.

Our choices are not always easy. Our vision may not always align with yours. That’s okay – this is where we grow and learn from each other. We also know we won’t get everything right, but we try our best. Trying is better than acquiescing and languishing in complicity.

Share Button

The Crime Of Mass Acceptance

Photo by Jason J Woody

Photo by Jason J Woody via Facebook

On May 5, Cecily McMillan was found guilty of second degree assault for defending herself when a policeman sexually assaulted her. She is being held without bail until her sentencing hearing.

I don’t even know how to begin to express my shock and outrage over both the way the trial was conducted and the verdict. Judge Ronald Zweibel “consistently ruled that any larger context of what was happening around McMillan at the time of the arrest (let alone Bovell’s own history of violence) was irrelevant to the scope of the trial,” stated The Guardian’s Molly Knefel. The jury was never told about the police violence in Zucotti Park that night; they didn’t hear about the police violence when the park was first cleared; they never heard about the violence aimed at the Occupy movement at all, because Zweibel had deemed it “irrelevant”.

The police testimony was considered golden; the physical evidence against the police as fallible by the jury. The prosecution questioned whether or not Cecily’s injuries were caused by the police, while downplaying the fact that the plaintiff, Officer Grantley Bovell, repeatedly identified the wrong eye when testifying as to how Cecily injured him. Officer Bovell had a documented history of violent behavior- irrelevant said Zweibel. The other allegations of violent behavior by him the same night Cecily was arrested? You guessed it- irrelevant.

Liberty Plaza protest over Cecily McMillan verdict. Photo by Casper Snyder

Liberty Plaza protest over Cecily McMillan verdict. Photo by Casper Snyder via Facebook

The limiting of “relevant” information and evidence mirrored the treatment by the Occupy movement by the mainstream press. The horrific violence by the police towards the Occupy movement has been spun by the mainstream media into being acceptable behavior, while the protesters have been made the criminals by the same media ever since the Occupy movement started. This was readily apparent during the jury selection, when many prospective jurors were dismissed due to outright bias against the Occupy movement and/or its members.

On the #Justice4Cecily Facebook page, the defense team statesWe are devastated by the Jury’s verdict today. It has been clear from day one that Cecily has not received a fair and open trial.” And, Cecily’s mother speaks as only a mother can: “… Today, lady Justice, you have failed my daughter and removed a bit of the light from her eyes. It’s is not acceptable! However, she will continue to survive #1 cause she is made of sterner stuff and #2 cause that who I in the hell raised her to be!!” 

NYPD outside courthouse after Cecily McMillan verdict. Photo by Virginia Simson

NYPD outside courthouse after Cecily McMillan verdict. Photo by Virginia Simson via Facebook

Molly Knefel finishes her article with a powerful statement: “It’s why #myNYPD shocked enough people to make the papers – because it wasn’t one bruised or broken civilian body or one cop with a documented history of violence. Instead, it was one after another after another, a collage that presented a more comprehensive picture – one of exceptionally unexceptional violence that most of America has already accepted.”

This is the crime we’re all guilty of. We don’t hold the people who enforce our laws accountable when they themselves violate the same laws. We hear every day about police brutality in our communities, of police thinking that they’re above the law that they’re supposed to enforce. We can’t let this go on any longer.

For information on how to support Cecily in the times ahead, please visit justiceforcecily.com

Editorial Note from MNgranny: Occupy World Writes can not help but gasp at the realization that this sets the dangerous precedent for women: If you are sexually assaulted by a police officer and you choose to defend yourself as a woman, you could face felony charges and up to seven years in prison. As a felon, you lose your right to vote after serving your sentence, and you are economically disadvantaged because employers are reluctant to hire convicted felons.

Welcome to the further oppression of women in a country that “practices” equality. Maybe someday we’ll get serious about it.

 

Share Button

Happiness IS Everything

256px-Oxygen480-emotes-face-smile.svgMost of us can point to a time in our lives that we were truly happy, just as we can point to a time that we were truly unhappy. What makes the difference in the lives of people who feel they are trapped in unhappiness? Why do some people seem happy no matter what happens, while others remain unhappy when everything says they should be in a much better place?

To understand  the question and the answer, we will look at the elements of happiness. We are all familiar with the old cliches – happiness is a soft purring kitten, happiness is the extra cherry on your sundae, happiness is a loaded gun. What this tells us is that we place more stock in the outcomes and evidence of being happy than we do in understanding the root of what provides us that feeling.

Happiness can not be bought. I’ve been to the Mall of America – there is no “Happiness Here” store. It can not be dug up, learned or given to you. An awesome gift might make you happy, but it does not give you happiness. That comes from somewhere else. As innate as our instinct for survival, happiness comes from within.

But how can happiness be realized by someone trapped in poverty through income inequality? How can someone with unknown medical issues be happy without the ability to seek treatment? How would you expect an unemployed worker to feel happiness when unemployment insurance is denied? How can a hungry child in school feel happy when other kids get meals and theirs is taken from them in the lunch line? How can a college graduate feel happy, knowing they carry more in student loan debt than many average homeowners? How can an American vote with confidence and happiness in a gerry-mandered district with risk of voter ID laws eliminating the voices of fellow constituents?

We hear reports all the time about how mental illness – specifically depression – has reached all but epidemic proportions in this country. Yet we seem unwilling to recognize that many of these people that struggle with this insidious disease might fare better in a world that gives them hope for happiness – health, income, education, career;  what ever values we seek to attain that feeling is everyone’s right. Not rights of those born to rich families, those with the correct color skin, those with “normal” sexual orientation, those with the right credentials and connections.

When you feel unhappy, know you are not alone.

When you feel happy, look for someone to infect. This is the one thing I hope ObamaCare can’t cure!

Share Button

Nothing To Crow About

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons

Two weeks from now marks the 60th anniversary of a very special day in United States history. On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court in an unaminous decision declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional. The decision overturned Plessy v Ferguson, an 1896 decision that allowed state-sponsored segregation, insofar as it applied to public education. The 1954 decision, Brown v Board of Education, stated that  “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.” This decision marked the beginning of the civil rights movement in the United States.

The ruling wasn’t universally liked, or followed for that matter. In 1957, Governor Orval Faubus deployed the Arkansas National Guard to assist segregationists in blocking nine black students from entering an all white high school in Little Rock. Twenty days later, President Eisenhower ordered the 101st Airborne Division to Little Rock to protect the students, and federalized the entire Arkansas National Guard, thus taking them out of the hands of Faubus. In a speech broadcast on nationwide television and radio, Eisenhower stated that when the decrees of a Federal court were obstructed, “the law and the national interest demanded that the President take action.” 

The same year, the Florida legislature passed an Interposition Resolution declaring the decision null and void, but Governor LeRoy Collins refused to sign it. In 1962, both the Mississippi Governor and Lieutenant Governor were arrested and charhed with contempt for their part in blocking James Meredith’s entry to the University of Mississippi. Robert Kennedy as the U. S. Attorney General eventually sent 500 Marines in to stop the segregationists who were rioting. In 1963, Alabama Governor George Wallace personally blocked the door to Foster Auditorium to prevent two black students from enrolling. Plus, there were many examples of such animosity towards the law in other cities and towns.

So, it’s 60 years later, and how far have we come? In 1963, about 1 percent of black children in the South attended school with white children. By the early 1970s, 90 percent of black children attended desegregated schools, due to court oreder and aggressive policing by federal agencies who had the power to withhold federal money from districts who refused to desegregate. However, in recent years, this has been changing, and not in a positive way.

A recent study by ProPublica found that “officials in scores of school districts do not know the status of their desegregation orders, have never read them, or erroneously believe that orders have been ended. In many cases, orders have gone unmonitored, sometimes for decades, by the federal agencies charged with enforcing them.” At the height of court enforced integration, there were 750 school districts known to be under desegregation orders. Today, there’s more than 300 under orders, with some being due to judges determining that they haven’t fully complied.

How did we get to this point? The courts. According to ProPublica, some federal courts don’t even know how many desegregation orders still exist on their dockets. There’s also been an increasing number of cases where federal judges release districts from court oversight even where segregation prevails, at times taking the lack of action in cases as evidence that there aren’t any issues. In 1972, only about 25 percent of black students in the South attended schools in which at least nine out of 10 students were racial minorities, due to the federal policing. In districts released from desegregation orders between 1990 and 2011, 53 percent of black students now attend such schools,

Then there’s the Supreme Court. Since the 1990s, the Supreme Court has limited the power of parents to challenge racial inequities in schools. Districts not under court orders are prohibited from using race as a consideration to balance schools.

There’s also the lack of funding to enforce the laws that stand. Ronald Reagan, upon taking office in 1981, immediately cut federal financial support for desegregation efforts. Reagan’s head of the Justice Department’s civil rights division, William Bradford Reynolds, said the department would not “compel children who do not want to choose to have an integrated education to have one.” The process further accelerated under George H.W. Bush.

In an article in The Atlantic called Segregation Now, Nikole Hannah-Jones discusses the Tuscaloosa, Alabama school system and tells the story of Central High School. Central High School came about from a 1979 order by a federal judge to combine two segregated high schools into one large integrated school. By the end of the 1980s, Central High School was a shining example of what integration could achieve, with both academic excellence and good sports teams. But, in 2000, a federal judge released the Tuscaloosa school system from its court-ordered desegregation mandate, claiming the job was done. Freed from the court orders, the one large diversified school has split into three smaller schools. Central High itself, instead of having a large amount of students from varying economic and racial to only serving the poorest section of town, and the student population’s 99% black.

Last year, the Supreme Court struck down key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. And, this year, they struck down Affirmative Action, leaving states the right to opt out. Add these to the systematic destruction of the desegregation of our schools, and it’s obvious that Jim Crow’s back, and he’s as ugly as ever.

 

 

Share Button

Some Time With The Neighbors

By Gage Skidmore [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Governor Scott Walker. By Gage Skidmore [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

The first house I lived in that I remember well was the house our family lived in during the late ’50s and early ’60s. We lived in a semi-rural area west of the Twin Cities (now considered a fairly close in suburb), and it was the beginning of the housing explosion in the area. The area was farmland with little towns and housing developments scattered along the main roads, and we lived in one of the housing developments. Everybody knew everybody, and for the most part, we were all friends with each other. Even as a child, I always knew what was going on with my neighbors.

I’m finding as I grow older that I miss a lot of the simplicity of those days, but what I really miss is the feeling that you know your neighbors. So, I decided I should check up on my neighbors in the next state over and see what they’ve been doing recently.

In an op-ed written on April 24 and published in the Wisconsin State Journal on April 27, Governor Scott Walker claims that Wisconsin is better off than four years ago. He says that 130,000 jobs were lost during former Governor Jim Doyle’s last term – which is true. Of course, he doesn’t mention that this was during the height of the 2008 financial fiasco, and massive job losses were happening all across the country. He crows that he’s created 100,000 new jobs since he took office, conveniently ignoring the fact that he’d promised 250,000 new jobs if he was elected, and that Wisconsin ranks 37th in the number of new jobs created. But, I digress…

He also claims that he took a $3 billion deficit and turned it into a $1 billion surplus. Of course, he doesn’t mention that the surplus was reached through things such as cutting the education budget by 15.3% (the nation’s 7th largest cut). He says he’s reduced the tax burden on the citizens by $2 billion, yet the tax breaks went to the wealthy and not the middle and working class families. And, his proposed tax cuts in his latest budget will add $100 million to the state deficit (running deficit budgets, Scott? I thought you said you had a surplus) for a grand total of $800 million structural deficit over three years, yet he fails to address the tax increases on the middle and working class that started with the 2011-13 budget.

On April 29, U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman struck down Wisconsin’s voter ID law as unconstitutional. MNgranny covered that and other recent court decisions in her article from May 30.

The Republican Party state convention opened May 2 in Milwaukee, and Brett Husley was there to greet the delegates. A Democratic state representative from Madison who’s running a one man campaign for governor, Husley was dressed in a homemade Confederate soldier’s uniform. He went viral earlier this week when he announced his plans to hand out KKK hoods to each delegate entering the convention. However, after criticism from both sides of the aisle (and nationwide) for this insane idea, he decided to leave the hoods in his car.

Why the uniform and hoods? Maybe it’s because the convention will be voting on resolutions that sound like we’ve traveled back to the ’60s – 1860s, that is. One resolution would assert the right of the state “under extreme circumstances” to secede from the United States, and the second asserts the right to nullify any federal law. Many Wisconsin conservatives have publicly opposed the resolutions, such as Scott Walker; that would look really good considering there’s a possible 2016 presidential run by Walker, no? Conservative talk show host Charlie Sykes called it “crackpotism on steroids,” a rather fitting description. On the other hand, Mike Murphy, a member of the Wisconsin GOP’s executive committee, says “secession is as American as apple pie.”

That’s what’s happening with the neighbors across the river. I’m glad there’s a wide river and a state line separating us, because while it’s fun to visit the crazy neighbors every once in a while, it sure feels good to come back home where it’s sane.

Share Button

Mayday! Mayday!

May Day march in San Jose, CA 2006. By z2amiller (IMG_4919_2.jpg) [CC-BY-SA-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

May Day march in San Jose, CA 2006. By z2amiller (IMG_4919_2.jpg) [CC-BY-SA-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Yesterday, it was the first of May. And, as with every May 1 I can remember, there were marches, celebrations and protests around the world. But, why May 1? What makes that day so special to workers and other activists?

The year was 1884. That summer, the Federation of Organized Trades and Labor Unions called for May 1, 1886 to be the start of a national movement calling for the establishment of an eight hour working day. Eight hour days were already Federal law, but neither Federal or various state governments were enforcing it. In Illinois, this meant that employers were forcing workers to sign waivers of the law as a condition of employment.

On May 1, 1886, the demonstrations started. Chicago with its large workers movement had the biggest demonstration the first day, with 80,000 workers marching up Michigan Avenue carrying union banners. The solidarity shown by the workers made some employers start to fear a workers revolt, while others quickly offered their workers a shorter working day and other concessions. On May 2, there was a smaller but still peaceful march of about 35,000 workers. Then, came May 3.

On May 3, the Chicago police attacked picketing workers outside the McCormick Reaper Works. Four workers were killed and many others were injured as the police drove away the striking workers and protected strikebreakers. Labor leaders and activists called for a rally to happen the next day, May 4, at Haymarket Square.

May Day 2012 at the Haymarket Riot Memorial.  By Seth Anderson from Chicago, us (Occupy Barrier  Uploaded by Ralgis) [CC-BY-SA-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

May Day 2012 at the Haymarket Riot Memorial. By Seth Anderson from Chicago, us (Occupy Barrier Uploaded by Ralgis) [CC-BY-SA-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

The next day, 2500 workers showed up, as did Chicago Mayor Carter Harrison, who attended as an observer. As the rally went on, which Mayor Harrison described as peaceful, the crowd began to depart as it began to rain. Then, when there were only two hundred protesters remaining, 176 policemen showed up with rifles. Somebody (their identity unknown) threw a bomb at the police. The police responded by opening fire. Seven policemen were killed. The body count among the protesters is less documented; I’ve seen estimates anywhere from four to eight dead and 30 to 40 injured to an unknown number dead and hundreds more injured.

The next day, martial law was declared not only in Chicago, but throughout the nation. Anti-labor governments all over the world used the events in Chicago as an excuse to crush unions. In Chicago, the police used the Haymarket Riot as justification to round up labor leaders and radical elements, while the corporate owned newspapers cheered the prosecution of “bomb makers” and “red ruffians.”

Eight people were put on trial for being “instigators”; all of them labeled by the prosecution and the press as being “anarchists.” The following “trial” was a mockery of the justice system, with the Chicago Tribune offering to pay the jury if the defendants were found guilty being a prime example of the bias exhibited throughout the trial. On August 26, 1886, the jury found all eight guilty, even though many of the defendants were not present at the Haymarket Riot, and their alleged involvement was never proven. Seven of them received the death sentence, and the other received a 15 year prison sentence.

On November 11, 1887, four of the defendants were hung, and one had committed suicide the night before. The remaining two with death sentences had their sentences commuted to life in prison, and in 1893 all of the surviving defendants were pardoned by Governor John P. Altgeld, who then went on record condemning the whole legal system which had let this happen.

May Day clash in Istanbul 2013. By Birhanb (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

May Day clash in Istanbul 2013. By Birhanb (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

In 1889, a delegate from what was by then known as the American Federation of Labor (formerly the Federation of Organized Trades and Labor Unions mentioned above) recommended at an international labor conference in Paris that May 1 be set aside as International Labor Day in memory of the Haymarket incident and the travesty of justice that followed.

So, what happened this year? In Turkey, 51 people were hurt and 138 arrested as police and protesters clashed in Istanbul. At least five people were injured in Phnom Penh, Cambodia during protests calling for, among other things, the overturning of a law outlawing such protests. Police clashed with protesters in many other cities, including Hamburg, Germany and here in the United States, Seattle. In others, there were peaceful (or semi peaceful) marches; an estimated 100,000 showed up in Red Square for the first large May Day celebration in Russia since the Soviet era, and there were events in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco; practically every major city across the globe had some event today.

We at Occupy World Writes stand in solidarity with workers around the globe. May this year bring us closer to equality and opportunity for all.

Share Button