Monthly Archives: August 2015

Police Arrest 50 Demonstrators as State of Emergency Declared in Ferguson

Under Moral Monday banner, protesters marking one-year anniversary of Michael Brown’s death take part in civil disobedience outside Ferguson courthouse

By Deirdre Fulton, staff writer for Common Dreams. Published 8-10-2015

Protesters blocking I-70 in St, Louis, 8-10-15. Photo via Facebook

Protesters blocking I-70 in St, Louis, 8-10-15. Photo via Facebook

At least 50 people were arrested outside the Thomas F. Eagleton Federal Courthouse in Ferguson, Missouri on Monday, where they were demanding the dissolution of the Ferguson Police Department.

Meanwhile, despite mostly peaceful protests marred by an officer-involved shooting overnight that left a teenager in critical condition, the St. Louis County declared a state of emergency for Ferguson on Monday. Demonstrators are marking the one-year anniversary of the shooting death of black teenager Michael Brown, who was killed by white police officer Darren Wilson on August 9, 2014. Continue reading

Share Button

First Step for Reform: APA Votes to Bar Psychologists From Colluding in Torture

Largest association of psychologists passes measure prohibiting members from participating in interrogations done in name of national security

Written by Nadia Prupis, staff writer for Common Dreams. Published 8-8-15.

The American Psychological Association's in-depth role in U.S. torture of detainees was revealed in a landmark report released earlier this year. (Photo: Justin Norman/flickr/cc)

The American Psychological Association’s in-depth role in U.S. torture of detainees was revealed in a landmark report released earlier this year. (Photo: Justin Norman/flickr/cc)

The American Psychological Association (APA) on Friday voted overwhelmingly to bar its members from participating in the interrogation of U.S. prisoners on foreign soil, officially ending the association’s complicity in torture of detainees and taking the first step out of “the dark side.”

All but one member of the APA’s 173-person Council of Representatives voted to end the association’s collusion with the CIA and other U.S. intelligence agencies in abusive interrogations as well as the so-called “noncoercive” kind now being carried out by the Obama administration.

Guantánamo Bay and Abu Ghraib military psychologist Col. Larry James cast the sole dissenting vote. There were also seven abstentions and one recusal.

The debate among members at their annual meeting in Toronto was reportedly emotional as they rehashed the bombshell internal investigation, published earlier this year, which exposed the APA’s participation in the CIA’s brutal methods of imprisonment and questioning. The Hoffman Report led to the swift resignations of several top APA officials, including its CEO, who stepped down in July.

Reports on the vote began circulating last week. An APA statement on July 29 recommended that its members adopt a policy prohibiting “psychologist participation in interrogation of persons held in custody by military/intelligence authorities.”

The vote was met with a standing ovation. The ban states that psychologists “shall not conduct, supervise, be in the presence of, or otherwise assist any national security interrogations for any military or intelligence entities, including private contractors working on their behalf, nor advise on conditions of confinement insofar as these might facilitate such an interrogation.”

“This is an extraordinary victory because these prohibitions are clear, they’re implementable, and people will be held accountable,” council member Steven Reisner told the Guardian on Friday. The APA will go “from leading us into the dark side to leading us out of the dark side.”

Nadine Kaslow, an APA member and head of the investigation committee, told the New York Times that the vote was “a very resounding yes.” Susan McDaniel, the association’s president-elect, added that it was “a tremendous step in the right direction.”

Reisner also noted that the vote only prohibits psychologists from colluding in interrogations conducted in the name of national security, ignoring “domestic cruelty” carried out within the U.S. justice system. But he said he hoped the APA’s decision could influence the treatment of American prisoners as well. “We have to consider that in the future,” he said.

While reformers welcomed the vote, they steadfastly maintained that it was only one crucial element in fixing the APA’s broken “moral compass.” That includes not just its actions in aiding torture, but also its suppression of would-be whistleblowers and others who objected to the association’s role in the program.

APA council member Stephen Soldz, who has helped lead the charge for reform at the association, stated on Friday that there is “something profoundly wrong with the way the organization functions…. No one in leadership ever spoke up against it. Not one board member or anyone in leadership over the past 10 years said, ‘This is not right.'”

Acknowledging as such in an APA statement, McDaniel added, “We have much work ahead as we change the culture of APA to be more transparent and much more focused on human rights. In addition, we will institute clearer conflict-of-interest policies going forward, all of which are aimed at ensuring that APA regains the trust of its members and the public.”

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.

Share Button

Shell Cuts Off ALEC, But Greenpeace Says PR Stunt Won’t Save Arctic

Oil giant cuts ties with right-wing lobbying group, still plans to drill for oil in the Arctic

Written by Nadia Prupis, staff writer for Common Dreams. Published 8-7-15.

Activists surround a Shell drilling rig in Seattle as the oil company attempts to move its vessels into the Arctic for a drilling operation. (Photo: Backbone Campaign/flickr/cc)

Activists surround a Shell drilling rig in Seattle as the oil company attempts to move its vessels into the Arctic for a drilling operation. (Photo: Backbone Campaign/flickr/cc)

Royal Dutch Shell on Friday announced that it would not renew its partnership with the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), citing the corporate lobbying organization’s continued denial of climate change, in a move that environmental groups say does nothing to absolve the oil giant from its destructive business model.

“ALEC advocates for specific economic growth initiatives, but its stance on climate change is clearly inconsistent with our own,” said Shell spokesperson Curtis Smith on Friday. “We have long recognized both the importance of the climate challenge and the critical role energy has in determining quality of life for people across the world. As part of an ongoing review of memberships and affiliations, we will be letting our association with ALEC lapse when the current contracted term ends early next year.”

For decades, ALEC has pushed against federal efforts encouraging private companies to invest in renewable energy sources. Shell follows BP as the latest oil giant to abandon the controversial right-wing group after a campaign led by the Union of Concerned Scientists. According to the Guardian, the Canadian National Railway—a major coal transporter—also quietly severed its financial ties with ALEC on Friday.

But while the campaign against ALEC helps highlight the group’s role in spreading climate science denial, simply ending partnerships with it is not enough to salvage the fossil fuel industry’s reputation among environmental activists—particularly as Shell continues its controversial mission to drill for oil in pristine Arctic waters.

As Greenpeace spokesperson Travis Nichols said on Friday, “It’s a bad sign for the climate denial movement that ALEC’s rhetoric is too extreme even for a cynical exploitative corporation like Shell. It’s also clear that Shell’s ill-conceived Arctic drilling plan is causing a PR panic, but this move won’t fix Shell’s bad name.”

“It’s completely absurd for Shell to claim it wants to confront climate change while engaging in this destructive plan to drill in the Alaskan Arctic,” Nichols continued.

Charlie Kronick, a senior campaign adviser with Greenpeace, told the Guardian: “Shell is being dragged kicking and screaming out of [ALEC] due to investor and public pressure. But they have a long way to go to bridge the massive gap between the reality of their business plans, most notably their catastrophic plan to drill in the Arctic, their other anti-climate lobbying, and their claimed leadership on climate change.”

Added Nick Surgey, director of research at the Center for Media and Democracy: “It’s obviously a positive step for Shell to stop funding [ALEC] and its climate change denial. Other oil companies should join them. Unfortunately this is another occasion when Shell’s positive language about climate change doesn’t match their actions. Drilling for oil in the Arctic might turn a profit for Shell, but it must be stopped if we want to avoid catastrophic climate change.”

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.

Share Button

The Legacy of Michael Brown: Why America should weep with Ferguson

One year following the flashpoint unleashed in Ferguson after the shooting death of unarmed teenager Michael Brown by officer Darren Wilson, Ferguson may look somewhat different, but their reality has been dismal compared to the promises made in order to bring about an end to the protests that gripped the community.

Mother of Michael Brown, Lesley McSpadden. Image via flickr.

Mother of Michael Brown, Lesley McSpadden. Image via flickr.

As a nation, we watched the news. The majority of whites (80%) still do not see why these protests happen. They do not understand that, in contrast, nearly 78% of the national black community sees police forces in their communities in much the same light as those in Ferguson did one year ago. We have seen the growth of the #BlackLivesMatter movement, and the backlash for that advocacy. We have listened to a national conversation that has ended in the deafening roar of silence rather than the changes the people recognized were needed.

We now watch as police forces reluctantly pass new rules and policies, slow to introduce new tactics and unwilling to open real conversation with those they are charged with “protecting and serving.” A prime example comes from Ferguson itself, where the city council has reviewed the proposal from the Department of Justice following their investigation that found evidence of a profit-driven court system and widespread racial bias by police. A recent report stated, “Ferguson Councilman Wesley Bell described the Justice Department’s plan as a typical bargaining tactic. “The DOJ didn’t expect us to accept their first proposal. This is just part of the negotiations,” said Bell, elected to the council in April. “That’s all. You want $200. You ask for $400.” With this attitude being prevalent among the predominately white city council, how are the people of Ferguson expected to believe change is coming?

According to The Counted, 695 people have been killed by police or law enforcement agencies since the beginning of 2015 alone (as of August 7, 2015). On average, that is more than 3 people per day. If any other organization or group ran around killing 3 American civilians per day without accountability and with a seemingly all-but spotless record of no wrong doing, we would demand action. (The Counted is a project working to count the number of people killed by police and other law enforcement agencies in the United States throughout 2015, to monitor their demographics and to tell the stories of how they died.)

Sandra Bland. Photo via Wikimedia Commons.

Sandra Bland. Photo via Wikimedia Commons.

Most recently, the death of Sandra Bland in a Texas jail cell defies explanation. It has led to attention of black women being abused and violated by police on a regular basis, yet going unreported. As a result, a demand to force those responsible to “Say Her Name” when there are victims has given rise to the movement #SayHerName.

Ferguson continues to weep. Deserving of every tear, these people have endured what most communities will never experience. Any mother, any parent, that can not take pause at the grief and sorrow of Michael’s mother is as heartless as his killer. Ferguson’s new police Lieutenant proudly says things are better, because she sees officers talking to each other and smiling more. Does she see that on the streets of the community they serve? Has anyone from the department looked?

Photo NLM Coalition via Twitter

Photo NLM Coalition via Twitter

Most Americans are unaware that the community that sees more abuse and violence from police and law enforcement agencies throughout America is the Native American community. Vastly under-reported and swept under the rugs in our halls of “justice”, these people have no where to turn for help. “It is a tribal issue,” they are told, if they are able to complain at all. As such, we are finally beginning to see the rise of #NativeLivesMatter.

When the international community looks at America and sees the treatment of our most marginalized citizens as human rights abuses and calls us on the carpet for it, shouldn’t we look more carefully within our own shores before starting up our war machines to invade countries we charge with human rights abuses?

We have a long way to go, America. You can not close the book on the chapter of Ferguson and assume Michael Brown’s story has ended, unless you also close the book on all the other lives that will be lost if we do not confront these issues as a population, and stop waiting for our government to do what it has failed miserably at doing up to this point.

May Michael Brown be able to Rest in Peace – some day.

Share Button

‘The Dream of Internet Freedom is Dying,’ Warns Top Civil Liberties Attorney

In keynote address to Black Hat security conference, Jennifer Granick tells experts: ‘We need to get ready to smash the Internet apart to make something better.’

Written by Lauren McCauley, staff writer for Common Dreams. Published 8-6-15.

19698653544_2c04a8bb63_z

Jennifer Granick at Black Hat. Photo: Black Hat Events via Flickr

“The dream of Internet freedom is… dying,” said attorney and civil liberties expert Jennifer Granick during her keynote speech before a major computer security conference in Las Vegas on Wednesday.

Granick, formally the civil liberties director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation and now the director of civil liberties at the Stanford Center for Internet and Society, was addressing some of the world’s foremost technology experts attending the annual Black Hat information security event this week.

“Centralization, regulation, and globalization,” Granick said, have wrought havoc on a space once thought of as “a world that would leave behind the shackles of age, of race, of gender, of class, even of law.”

The dream is dying, she said, because “we’ve prioritized things like security, online civility, user interface, and intellectual property interests above freedom and openness.” And governments, for their part, have capitalized on the fear of “the Four Horsemen of the Infocalypse: terrorists, pedophiles, drug dealers, and money launderers” to push for even more regulation and control, she added.

Granick’s dire pronouncement, which echoed similar assertions made by security experts and civil liberties groups, comes just over two years after National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden cracked open the seal on the U.S. government’s online spying capabilities and revealed just how little security and secrecy remain on the World Wide Web.

Late last month, Snowden himself made a direct plea to technologists to build a new Internet specifically for the people.

Meanwhile, the U.S. government continues to push for expanded surveillance capabilities, such as with the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA) currently making its way through Congress, which would allow companies to share personal user information with the government if there is a so-called “cybersecurity threat.”

In her keynote address, Granick also took on the undisclosed rules which supposedly enable much of the government’s spying activities. “We need to get rid of secret law. We have secret law in this country and it is an abomination in the face of democracy,” Granick proclaimed, to much applause.

In the future, she further warned, Internet users won’t be aware of the “secret” software-driven decisions directly impacting their rights and privacy.

“Software will decide whether a car runs over you or off a bridge,” she said. “Things will happen and no one will really know why.”

“The Internet will become a lot more like TV and a lot less like the global conversation we envisioned 20 years ago,” Granick said, concluding that if this is the case, “we need to get ready to smash it apart to make something better.”

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.

Share Button

Seventy Years After Little Boy – Have We Learned Anything?

Seventy years ago today, the world as we knew it changed forever. On that day, the United States became the only country to ever use nuclear weapons against another country.

At the time this photo was made, smoke billowed 20,000 feet above Hiroshima while smoke from the burst of the first atomic bomb had spread over 10,000 feet on the target at the base of the rising column. Photo public domain via Wikimedia Commons.

At the time this photo was made, smoke billowed 20,000 feet above Hiroshima while smoke from the burst of the first atomic bomb had spread over 10,000 feet on the target at the base of the rising column. Photo public domain via Wikimedia Commons.

Somewhere between 45,000 and 80,000 people died that day, and between 19,500 and 40,000 people died in Nagasaki three days later. The same number would die as a direct result of the two bombs over the next four months.

The genie had been let out of the bottle. What had been accomplished could be duplicated. The Soviets, who already had a nuclear program underway, made the acquisition of a nuclear weapon a top priority. The arms race had come to “peacetime,” and the military-industrial complex grew in power by leaps and bounds.

Of course, you need delivery systems for these weapons. Besides strategic bombers, the United States and the Soviet Union both had missile development programs. Where did that knowledge come from? Scientists who worked for the Nazis at places such as the Peenemünde Army Research Center. Here in the US, the recruitment was known as Operation Paperclip.

Since Truman’s order authorizing Operation Paperclip expressly excluded anyone found “to have been a member of the Nazi Party, and more than a nominal participant in its activities, or an active supporter of Nazi militarism,” the Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency (JIOA) created false employment and political biographies for the scientists, while also erasing from public record the scientists’ Nazi Party memberships and régime affiliations. Once that was done, the scientists were granted security clearances by the U.S. government to work in the United States.

So, not only did we (the United States), kill thousands of people in a horrific manner never used before or since, we also brought in war criminals to make the weapons even more deadly. But wait! There’s more…

We hear from various media outlets about the dangers of relaxing sanctions against Iran, and how this will lead to Iran getting nuclear weapons. Where did Iran get its nuclear technology to begin with? If you guessed the United States, you guessed right. Under the “Atoms for Peace” program proposed by President Eisenhower in the early 1950s, American Machine and Foundry (AMF) built nuclear reactors in Iran, Pakistan and Israel. Notice that the only country of those three that hasn’t built a nuclear weapon is Iran…

The memorial at Ground Zero, Nagasaki. Photo by Dean S. Pemberton (Own work) [CC BY-SA 4.0-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.0], via Wikimedia Commons

The memorial at Ground Zero, Nagasaki. Photo by Dean S. Pemberton (Own work) [CC BY-SA 4.0-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.0], via Wikimedia Commons

It’s been seventy years, and the horror is still present. There’s still close to 200,000 people alive today that are classified by the Japanese government as hibakusha; a Japanese word that literally translates as “explosion-affected people,” and refers to people who were exposed to radiation from the bombings.

We in the United States claim to be the only judge of who can or can’t have nuclear weapons, while at the same time we’re responsible for the spreading of nuclear technology to the very countries who we worry about, and we’re the only country to ever use one. Our hypocrisy can be staggering at times.

Share Button

State Dept Accused of Watering Down Human Rights Ratings to Advance Obama Trade Agenda

Reuters investigation shows American diplomats played politics with annual human trafficking report

Written by Lauren McCauley, staff writer for Common Dreams. Published 8-4-15.

Fisherman raise their hands when asked who among them would like to go home. (Image via US State Department)

Fisherman raise their hands when asked who among them would like to go home. (Image via US State Department)

The U.S. State Department is being accused of playing politics with human rights after a damning new Reuters investigation published late Monday revealed that high level officials watered down the opinions of rights experts hired to evaluate nations’ human trafficking records seemingly to advance a number of the Obama administration’s key agenda items.

Exposing a “degree of intervention not previously known,” according to the investigation, there were 14 instances where senior American diplomats overruled the analyst opinions to inflate the record of “strategically important countries” for this year’s Trafficking in Persons Report, released last week.

Among those cases, Malaysia had its status upgraded from the lowest level “Tier 3” to the “Tier 2 Watchlist,” which is one rung down from “Tier 2,” despite analysts finding no improvement in the country’s trafficking record. Rights observers charge that this was a deliberate move to pave the way for the passage of the controversial Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement.

In June, Congress passed a provision barring the U.S. from entering into trade agreements with “Tier 3” countries. New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez (D), who had spearheaded that effort, issued a statement after the investigation was published, saying: “If true, the Reuters report further confirms what I, along with the human-rights community, have feared all along: The State Department’s trafficking report has been blatantly and intentionally politicized.”

Reuters reports:

Congressional sources and current and former State Department officials said experts in the [Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, or J/TIP] had recommended keeping Malaysia on Tier 3, highlighting a drop in human-trafficking convictions in the country to three last year from nine in 2013. They said, according to the sources, that some of Malaysia’s efforts to end forced labor amounted to promises rather than action.

The country has been cited for having a robust sex slavery industry as well as forced labor camps.

Though the news of Malaysia’s pending status change first broke last month, human rights groups on Monday reiterated their discontent.

“The vultures circled,” Phil Robertson, deputy director of the Asia Division for Human Rights Watch, told Huffington Post. “What you are seeing is significant damage to the credibility of that report because of these political games played back in Washington.”

Other countries where the State Department issued such “inflated recommendations,” according to human rights analysts, included: China, India, Cuba, Mexico, and Uzbekistan.

Reuters notes that “while a Tier 3 ranking can trigger sanctions limiting access to aid…such action is frequently waived.” However, the real power of the trafficking report “is its ability to embarrass countries into action.”

Lawmakers, including Menendez, on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee are convening on Thursday to review the State Department report.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.

Share Button

“The Look of Silence”: Will New Film Force U.S. to Acknowledge Role in 1965 Indonesian Genocide?

Published August 3, 2015 by DemocracyNow!

 

Republished under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License

Share Button

Calling all John Browns in Turkey

By Kani Xulam. Published August 1, 2015 by Rudaw

Idealized portrait of John Brown being adored by a slave mother and child as he walks to his execution on December 2, 1859. Image via Public Domain.

Idealized portrait of John Brown being adored by a slave mother and child as he walks to his execution on December 2, 1859. Image via Public Domain.

I hope there is a John Brown roaming around somewhere in Turkey—one who hates supremacy of Turks over the Kurds as much as John Brown detested the slavery of blacks in America.

Brown, an ardent abolitionist, determined to free the slaves through armed insurrection—which he tried in 1859 by raiding the U.S. Armory and Arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia.

Brown hoped to employ weapons and ammunition captured to arm slaves and overthrow the U.S.  Government, but his attack failed and Brown was tried for treason and promptly hanged.

One man in Turkey who comes close to Mr. Brown is Kemal Pir, a Laz native of Black Sea region in northeast Turkey, who died of a hunger strike in 1982 in Diyarbakir Military Prison while striking a blow against the Turks for the right of Kurdish self-determination.

Kurds will honor his noble memory forever.

But Turks themselves gifted to the world Ismail Besikci, a distinguished Turkish scholar and iron-willed disciple of truth, who spent seventeen years in jail for daring to tell his fellow Turks that there are Kurds in Turkey.

Yes, there was a time in Turkey, in the memory of people still living, when it was safer to say the world is flat, than to whisper—in dire fear—there are Kurds in the country!

Poor Turks had been brainwashed to view Kurds as evil incarnate and anyone who said anything positive about us suffered a cracked head or worse at the nearest police station.

When rehabilitation through torture didn’t work, stubborn souls were tossed into darkened dungeons for years, sometimes decades.

But Mr. Besikci never wavered. Like the famed Galileo who declared the sun was the center of our solar system, not the earth, he insisted that Kurds were a part of Turkey—and its original inhabitants no less.

That could only mean prison!

The Turks, to rub it in, made sure his torturers were turncoat Kurds.

But it didn’t work. The man of steel drove Turks nuts by courageously sticking to his principles.

John Brown also stuck to his principles.

Sitting atop his own coffin in the wagon driving him to the gallows, Brown still cheerfully championed the right of four million slaves to be equal citizens of the United States.

American poet Henry David Thoreau said John Brown “was like the best of those who stood at our bridge once, on Lexington Common and Bunker Hill, only he was firmer and higher principled.”

French novelist Victor Hugo urged that Brown not be hanged, arguing:

“There is something more frightening than Cain Killing Abel, and that is Washington killing Spartacus.”

Brown, just before the noose swathed his neck on December 2, 1859, declared he was “now quite certain that the crimes of this guilty land will never be purged away but with blood.”
That bloody carnage came shortly thereafter with the terrible country-splitting civil war of 1861-65, pitting family against family, followed by the abolition of slavery through the 13th Amendment.

Turkey, of course, is nothing like America, but if poets are to be believed, it is no different than the America of John Brown’s day, saddled with the horrendous weight of the subjugation of one people to another.

The exquisitely sensitive Euripides knew it and said that when one is not free to express one’s thoughts, he or she is in a state of perpetual “slavery.”

Well, 20 million Kurds are firmly mired in that state—since they are barred from practicing the politics of Kurdish identity in public.
Subjects don’t even need a country, Turkish politicians arrogantly assert!

The reason:  “We are their protectors,” proclaimed Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu on July 26, 2015.

Such arrogance is nothing but an echo of the American attitude after John Brown raided the Federal Armory at Harpers Ferry: Slaves are not equal to whites.

Indeed, two years before Brown’s raid on Harpers Ferry, no less than the U.S. Supreme Court decreed in its notorious Dred Scott decision that blacks, whether free or slave, were not citizens.

If we substitute “Kurds” for “blacks,” not much has changed today in America—even though a black man occupies its highest office.

President Obama is just as impervious to the plight of the Kurds today—as America was to the quandary of blacks 156 years ago.

That is why we need Turks, who may be potential John Browns, to force politicians to halt the deplorable domination of 20 million Kurds by some 50 million Turks.

However, as an admirer of Mahatma Gandhi’s nonviolent techniques, honesty compels me to note that John Brown’s raid triggered the death of one Marine and six civilians.

So I cannot in good conscience urge a Turkish John Brown to utilize murder to fight evil. Or to quote the timely words of Selahattin Demirtas, the co-chair of Peoples Democracy Party (HDP), “You can not clean blood with blood.”

But I can—and strongly do in good conscience—urge them to throw monkey wrenches into the treacherous Turkish war machine.

The Turks who are now bombing southern Kurdistan should simply unload their munitions on uninhabited mountains.

The Americans, who are aiding the Turks with intelligence data for “high-value targets,” should guide them to flocks of sheep or goats.

After all, to some Turks in influential positions, we are the same as sheep or goats.

But you Americans could at least sleep better at night if you did not spill innocent blood at the altar of Turkish bigotry.

Republished with the author’s permission.

Share Button

As ‘Do-Or-Die’ Talks End In Failure, Could TPP Be Derailed for Good?

Global justice campaigners say disintegration of Maui negotiations ‘good news for people and the planet’

By Sarah Lazare, staff writer for Common Dreams. Published August 1, 2015

Protesters in Hawaii. Photo by Akaku Maui Community Media

Photo by Akaku Maui Community Media

This week’s closed-door Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations in Maui, which President Barack Obama hoped would be the last round, ended Friday in failure to reach a final agreement, thereby pushing a U.S. ratification fight into the tumultuous 2016 presidential election cycle at the earliest—and raising hopes that the corporate-friendly accord could be derailed for good.

Global justice campaigners, who will now have more time to organize against the pact, were buoyed by the development, with Sujata Dey of Council of Canadians declaring on Saturday: “This stall in talks could mean the death of the deal, and a win for the public interest all over the world.” Continue reading

Share Button